The reason there are so many "Conspiracy Theories" is because there are so many "Conspiracies." Larry Flinchpaugh
Conspiracy theory From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A conspiracy theory is an explanatory proposition that accuses two or more persons, a group, or an organization of having caused or covered up, through secret planning and deliberate action, an illegal or harmful event or situation.
Published on Oct 11, 2017
As part of our ongoing effort to explore our universe and seek answers to really big questions, we recently interviewed Dr. Steven Greer, M.D. Dr. Greer, a prominent UFO researcher and emergency room physician, founder of Sirius Disclosure and creator of the popular new documentary Unacknowledged, explains that he believes many so-called "UFO sightings" are actually sightings of human-made aircraft, and that super secret groups exist inside the U.S. government which plan to stage a faked, "false flag" alien invasion attack in order to roll out globalist government that tramples individual human liberties forever. Whether or not you agree with his analysis, Dr. Greer is an intriguing and highly intelligent individual who has uncovered an astonishing wealth of evidence to support his explanations.
How is it possible that the Sumerian's ONLY get 1-3 Sentences in the Textbooks? The world's FIRST human civilization that dates back 6,000 years, that created our modern system of time, the calendar, writing, agriculture, and everything else is not required learning in school. This video outlines what the Sumerian tablets/records.
The Official Steve Quayle Youtube Channel
Johnny Cirucci October 20, 2016-
”The local papers pretend that Donald Trump is running his campaign, but if you search deep enough through to section D you’ll see stories such as Trump’s private meeting with one of his controllers, the Archbishop of New York, Timothy Cardinal Dolan.”
“If Americans are tired of endless war and unending “free trade” that has sent American jobs to be done by slaves for pittance overseas, they have one choice: Hillary Rodham Clinton.” What?
“Hillary is the business partner of William Jefferson Blythe Clinton—also educated and screened by the Jesuits at Georgetown.”
“Hillary and Bill were installed into power, first in the governor’s mansion in Arkansas (behind Bill’s real father, Winthrop Rockefeller) and they later followed on the heels of their good friend, former Director of the CIA, George Herbert Walker Bush into the White House (named for the Jesuit who previously owned the location; Andrew White). The Bush and Clinton crime dynasties were installed by the Central Intelligence Agency on a mountain of cocaine trafficked through Mena, Arkansas.”
“Jesuit-trained Roman Catholics run absolutely every institution in the United States government from Congress to the military to the Judiciary to the Executive. The few who aren’t are controlled by other means from blackmail to bribery and are usually in a secret society as well which holds its members to maintaining the Luciferian agenda on pain of death.”
Cara is an author and an alternative researcher. She has two great books out at the moment; one is The Sun Thief and her most recent title is Dangerous Imagination, Silent Assimilation. Cara just finished up The Great Remembering which is the first in a series of several workbook episodes she is planning on releasing which will pull back the curtain and expose the forbidden knowledge of the matrix.
Tonight’s conversation with Cara is wide ranging as always. We talk about her research into the work of Anatoly Fomenko and his theory of phantom time where he posits, as does Cara, that huge chunks of what we think of and have been taught as true history - is complete fiction. We then delve into the parasitical force which has commandeered the minds of much of humanity and finish with Cara offering her insights on her next Episode dealing with the Phe.
* Cara's website: https://vortexcourage.me/
* Buy 'The Great Remembering': http://tinyurl.com/glsd4sf
* Buy Cara's books: http://tinyurl.com/hgampzh
* Anatoly T. Fomenko: http://www.chronologia.org/en/
* New Earth YouTube Channel: http://tinyurl.com/z5yf8xe
* The Vatican and The Jesuits: http://tinyurl.com/bv7uy49
* Phantom Time Hypothesis: http://tinyurl.com/zff9tsb
There’s been much speculation about the recent closures of Walmart stores around the country. Walmart claims the their stores, closed almost simultaneously in different cities, is a result of plumbing issues. But many employees and customers suspect that something else is going on, though no one, including store managers, has any idea what that might be.
Photo of United States Air Force tunnel boring machine at Little Skull Mountain, Nevada, USA, December 1982. There are many rumors of secret military tunnels in the United States. If the rumors are true, machines such as the one shown here are used to make the tunnels. (Source: U.S. Department of Energy.)
The "Business Plot" (also the Plot Against FDR and the White House Putsch) was an alleged political conspiracy in 1933 wherein wealthy businessmen and corporations plotted a coup détat to overthrow United States President Franklin D. Roosevelt. In 1934, the Business Plot was publicly revealed by retired Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler testifying to the McCormack-Dickstein Congressional Committee.
Book Review of
Posted on Amazon.com/books
By Larry Mullins on October 15, 2012
I was working in downtown
Washington, D.C. on November 22, 1963, the day John F. Kennedy was killed. A few days later, I stood at Pennsylvania Avenue in bright November sunshine and watched an unforgettable funeral
procession. A team of white horses pulled a two wheeled artillery cart carrying JKF's flag-draped casket, followed by a black, saddled but rider less horse. Boots, placed reversed, were in the
stirrups. An unhurried, muffled drumbeat accompanied the inexpressible sensation of grief that pervaded the cool air. There was collective anguish for the man, of course, but also grief because it
seemed our country would never be the same. What I am about to write is not a political rant. Rather, it concerns the ever-lengthening shadow that continues to be cast to this day by the unthinkable
events of November 22, 1963.
I still have a copy of the Life magazine that came out just a few days after the assassination. An article in Life stated that the President had turned toward the School Book Depository, which explained the entrance wound that the Parkland doctors had discovered in his throat. Later this was corrected by the FBI, and we were told the Texas doctors were wrong about the entrance wound, it was an exit wound. By December 3rd a story was "leaked" to the press stating that J. Edgar Hoover and the FBI had already determined that Lee Harvey Oswald was the lone assassin. This information seemed to calm the distraught nation. Almost a year later, the Warren Commission Report was published. It was hailed by the mainstream media with virtually universal praise, although its supporting 26 volumes of evidence (with a supplementary FBI report) would not be published for another two months. I believe I am one of the very few people who ever read the 888 page Warren Commission Report.
The Warren Commission Report reassured Americans that there was no conspiracy, and that Jack Ruby, who had murdered Oswald, was also a lone assassin and in no way connected to organized crime. After reading the report, I explained to people how the first assassination bullet missed, how the second bullet hit Kennedy in the back, exited from his throat, and traveled on to wound Governor Connelly, and how the third bullet inflicted the final fatal head wound.
But new books began to emerge from credible researchers who reported that much of the evidence in the Commission's 26 volumes of documentation is dramatically contrary to its own findings. Clearly the Warren Commission had gone to extreme measures to ignore Jack Ruby's organized crime connections. Even more disturbing, it was equally apparent that not one witness to the assassination testified that the event had taken place the way the Warren Commission described it. Not one. Especially not John and Nellie Connelly. (Both of whom testified under oath that they were absolutely convinced that JFK was hit a moment before Governor Connelly, and by a different shot. If this is true, there had to be at least two assassins.) Not Zapruder, who filmed the tragedy and testified (along with scores of witnesses) that a shot definitely came from the grassy knoll. Evidence accumulated, and there was a steady decline in the credibility of the Warren Commission Report between 1964 and 1976. Lyndon Johnson disowned it before he died. Driven by public entreaties, there was a new congressional inquiry, 1976 - 1978, called the House Select Committee on Assassinations.
The new governmental investigation managed to take a baby step toward reality. It determined that there had been a conspiracy that involved at least two shooters (one from the grassy knoll) and was probably orchestrated by organized crime. However, the government still could not tell us what happened, nor who was involved, and it still generally supported most of the incongruous conclusions of the Warren Commission Report. In 1993, the late Gaeton Fonzi, who spent three years as an investigator for the House Select Committee on Assassinations, lamented the failure in his book, The Last Investigation. Historians consider Fonzi's book among the preeminent and most scholarly of the six hundred or so that have been published on the Kennedy assassination. He wrote:
"Despite the clamor of the last few years, all the books, the films and the articles, the assassination of President John F. Kennedy is being allowed to go quietly into history. We must not let that happen-not yet, not ever ... The conspiracy to kill the President of the United States was a conspiracy against the democratic system-and thus a conspiracy against each and every one of us ... The Government has failed us. It is outrageous that in a democratic society, after two official investigations, our Government still tells us it doesn't know what happened."
I looked forward to Bill O'Reilly's new book. At last someone
would shift through the morass of information and distill a reasonable, no-spin presentation about what really happened on that catastrophic day in 1963. I was certain O'Reilly would dare to open the
forbidden doors. However, much as I like Bill O'Reilly, his book is mostly a sad rework of timeworn material. He finally gets around to addressing the assassination by page
245. In his final 50 pages the legendary "no-spin" man embraces the most flagrant spin-job in American history, the Warren Commission Report. How could O'Reilly examine the
assassination without scrutinizing the Commission's own published documentation and the FBI supplemental report? In them the autopsy drawings by Dr. James Humes and FBI agent James Sibert both
illustrate the back wound of JFK as lower than the supposed throat exit wound. Or how could O'Reilly ignore information in the FBI report by agents Sibert and O'Neil (who were present at the autopsy)
that stated Dr. Humes probed the back wound and determined the bullet had entered at a trajectory of "45 to 60 degrees" and had penetrated less than the length of his finger? Or the testimony of
Secret Service agent Glen Bennett who saw the bullet strike Kennedy "about four inches down from the right shoulder"? Or the testimony of Secret Service agent Clinton Hill who examined Kennedy's body
in the morgue and again described a back wound that could not possibly have exited from the President's throat because it was "about six inches below the neckline and to the right hand-side of the
O'Reilly and his coauthor played it safe and wrote a book that pretends the research and investigations between 1964 and 2012 simply never happened. Beyond this, what they did write about is rife with all the errors, assumptions, and grievously incompetent conclusions of the Warren Commission Report.
If Mr. O'Reilly's book had been submitted to a publisher by a non-celebrity, it would have been tossed in five minutes. "Killing Kennedy" is a colossal disappointment. Worse, it endangers the truth by assisting its submergence into fabricated history. "Killing Kennedy" is a disservice to the "folks" Mr. O'Reilly is supposed to be looking out for. Save your money. Or invest it in one of the more acclaimed books on the Kennedy assassination, such as The Last Investigation by Gaeton Fonzi
By Larry Mullins on October 15, 2012